2 Comments
User's avatar
HG's avatar

When writing on The Holy Prophet and his family one should be extremely careful choosing words being used. In the following quote "Karbala might have been buried in desert sand, lost to centuries of silence, if not for that woman" unquote you do not address the Honourable Lady Zainab as that women. Please correct it to read quote "Karbala might have been buried in desert sand, lost to centuries of silence, if not for the honourable and brave lady Zainab" unquote

A Thinker's avatar

Thank you for taking the time to read the article and for sharing your thoughts. We deeply appreciate your protective spirit and your devotion to the legacy of Sayyedah Zaynab (peace be upon her) — a reverence we share entirely.

Please rest assured that the original phrasing was never intended as disrespect. 'That woman' was a deliberate literary device — what writers call dramatic isolation: after the preceding paragraphs establish her monumental courage and the awe-inspiring stand she took in Damascus, narrowing to a single phrase was meant to convey the staggering reality that the preservation of Karbala against an entire empire came down to the force of one human being. The aim was to elevate her, never to diminish her.

That said, a rhetorical device only succeeds if it is received as it was intended. Where there is a risk that you — or other readers — might experience the phrase otherwise, we would rather remove that risk than defend the wording. In the spirit of tabyeen (clarification) (see https://www.reflections313.com/s/tabyeen for more clarity on what tabyeen is) , and as our own editorial judgement, we have therefore revised the line to read 'if not for one woman', which we feel carries the very same awe with no room for misreading.

Thank you again for engaging so deeply with the piece, and for the heartfelt spirit of your comment.